January 14, 2014

NEXT POST
Mediation Who is? Mediation is an alternative that can help him (a) to not have to deal with a contentious divorce. The mediator is usually a lawyer expert in this area, but could also be a counselor, psychologist or social worker. His work is to help that you and your spouse can communicate. The mediation consists of a third person who intercedes between you and your spouse. What does? The mediator will not tell you what to do, nor will choose who to be between you and your spouse supporter. The role of the mediator is to serve as a link between you and your spouse in a neutral manner. Hire a mediator is an option that should not happen if you and your spouse can still talk. The plan is that this mediated communication agreements that are beneficial to both. If you are unable to reach an agreement fair to both, the case shall be resolved in court. It should I? Hire a mediator that serves as a link between you and your spouse might seem as an additional cost. And the truth is that initially it will be, but arriving at a clear and accepted agreements between you and your spouse will cost you much less than if it ends up tangled in a long litigation process. Mediation is not the best solution for everyone. If you are not hold see face your spouse or would like restrallarlo against the floor, is best that you first check their emotions and then bring the case to the Court with a good lawyer. The responsibility of the spouse work with the mediator requires that you be open (a) to consider some of the proposals of your spouse. Does not come with one I attitude of I want it all because I were unfaithful. You need to be willing (a) to cooperate. Identify how much can give in to the demands of your spouse and fight so that what you are asking is a priority for the welfare or health of their children. By itself,...
PREVIOUS POST
Home Experience For almost all couples the common home is without doubt the most outstanding element that makes up their family heritage, making it also one of the main reasons of dispute and confrontation when deciding the termination of marital cohabitation. With respect to the use or distribution of the same, there is never absolute truths and individual study of the circumstances of the couple could either be taken for the same decision. It is not possible, unlike what happens with the money, split it into two halves, which greatly limits the field of action. How do you solve this issue for each of the modalities of separation? As de facto separation means abandoning "de facto" by a spouse of the same, both being continued to be the owners, not a problem in this regard. Difficulties arise when it comes to "formalize" the situation, with the separation of law. In these cases, both parties may decide by mutual agree how to organize the house, taking into account that could see their situation as something temporary, not ruling out the possibility of reconciliation (after all, this is an intermediate option in front of the divorce). Typically, however, would be for the spouse to stay with the custody of the children maintained the use of this common home until they reach adulthood. However, they could decide alternatives such as: 1 - To sell to a third party easiest option when both spouses have steady jobs and are financially independent, their earnings being similar. 2 - sold to one of the two, who remain living in it. Carried out a separation or divorce litigation, in court, would be as prescribed by the regulations. For example, in the Spanish case, it states that if the couple have children in common, their use and enjoyment shall be the spouse that has been assigned custody and you have not, or if they independent, will be awarded to the most needy of protection. We are referring, in any event, questions about the use and enjoyment as the property on the same unchanged,...