September 02, 2012

NEXT POST
Property After Divorce Who remains with the house after a divorce? Within the carried out processes of divorce through judicial litigations, one of the most difficult and taken factors is the election of which of both spouses will remain with the house who shared during their marriage. Nevertheless before making any decision on the matter it takes into account the following thing: If you remain with the house a) You must be sure that quedarte with her has sense for you, not from the sentimental financier but point of view. b) If the house is mortgaged, you do not only think about that, but also about the repairs, the maintenance, the taxes to the property, the water, the electricity and other services as well as expenses that you will have to assume. c) In order to be able quedarte with the house in its totality, you will have to pay to your spouse the value of its part, which calculates determining the value of the house except the mortgages that still are owed, if it is the case. Possibly you can exchange goods. That is to say, you would have to resign to your half of some goods that you own altogether with your spouse to pay half to him of the house. It considers that to quedarte with the house you could in a while obtain a great stability of instability in your life. Possibly you wish quedarte with her until surpassing the moment of the divorce and later for deciding what is what more it agrees to you to do. On the other hand it thinks about that to sell the house it could release them to both and it would benefit in addition you to begin a new life. Pinsalo and makes the decision well that benefits to you more. In case bandage the house As we said, normally to sell the house could improve not only your situation, but also the one of your ex- pair. It considers you can sell inasmuch as it, rstale well the costs that you will have...
PREVIOUS POST
Launching Act Tributary It makes use the CTN, in its art. 145: Art. 145. The regularly notified launching to the passive citizen only can be modified in virtue of: I - impugnation of the passive citizen; II - resource ex-officio; III - initiative ex-officio of the administrative authority, in the cases foreseen in article 149. (grifos not of the original) For this legal excerpt, effected the launching act tributary, the Public Farm it can, exactly not having the fiscal administrative litigation office (CTN, art. 145, I and II), for initiative of proper it, to revise it ex-officio, with bedding in interpolated proposition III of art. 145, of the CTN, observed the exception made use in the only paragraph of art. 149, of the same statute, that thus makes use: ' ' the revision of the launching alone can be initiated while not extinct the right of the Pblica' Farm; '. Article 149 of the CTN (01) describes all the hypotheses where the Public Farm can effect and review the launching ex-officio tributary. still, independently of the launching modality the one that the tribute is citizen, ex-officio, for declaration or homologation, the rule how much to the counting of the decadencial stated period to effect the launching ex-officio it is, to-somente, the described one in art. 173 of the CTN, that thus makes use: Art. 173. The right of the Public Farm to constitute the credit tributary after extinguishes 5 (five) years, counted: I - of the first day of the following exercise to that one where the launching could have been effected; II - of the date where if to become definitive the decision that will have annulled, for formal vice, the launching previously effected. Only paragraph. The right the one that if relates this article is extinguished definitively with the continuation of the stated period in foreseen, counted it of the date where she has been initiated the constitution of the credit tributary for the notification, to the passive citizen, of any indispensable writ of prevention to the launching.