June 11, 2012

NEXT POST
Marriage Skills The couple appears to frum for the hearing of conciliation marked for the judge in a separation process. I never liked very then the existing hearing of conciliation it couple. To the times the pombinhos already were living to them cover and kisses since the day where they had said ' ' until the death in separe' '. If the marriage already had twenty years and it does not give certain, they would not be fifteen minutes that the advice of the judge would go to fix everything, until why before the judge the couple already is advised with the priest, the shepherd, the bishop and without asking for had heard advice of the mother-in-law, the brother-in-law, the neighbor and the cousin of the neighbor, etc. and such. But on this day the separation was friendly and thought I who was question to homologate the agreement. The solemn act starts and the judge wants to know the reason of the separation. The alert lawyer the magistrate who did not have litigation and that he was everything made right and wanted only the homologation. Not satisfied, the judge if says debtor to try to make the couple to live together and insists to know the reason. Mr. Joo, says the reason to me Sir wants to release the Owner Maria. Doctor, fondness I do not want, but it wants thus and I am in agreement. Not, he cannot be, he says its Excellency. Owner Maria, then the problem is with Mrs. The reason says me which that takes Mrs. to want to separate itself of its husband. Doctor, leaves pra there, is thing mine and prefers not to touch in the subject. I do not know if the judge was curious excessively and wanted to know of the other people's life or if in fact he exactly wanted to recolocar in the tracks plus a marriage. Owner Maria, Mrs. this not understanding, while the subject will not be disclosed we goes to be here. Therefore, she soon treats to start to speak. She looks...
PREVIOUS POST
Concept of Preservation The Concept of Preservation or To extend the Fugaz Preservare Cristiano Silva Cardoso* Rita de Cssia Oliveira Pedreira* Beyond protecting a good so that the happened generations can know it. In appeared direction it can also be said that the act to preserve is the permanent one to sow of one ground sacred, or in other cases to consider it a litigation land. More than what to keep something that one day is, in this activity it has space to contribute itself with the institutionalization of cultural identities, as much in the aspect micron (individual or communitarian) how much in the macro-social aspect, fitting amongst its attributions the reinforcement of sovereignty icons and self-determination, being in turn intrinsically on to the power, the memory and to its exercise. It is to salutar, therefore, to consider aspects of basic importance for optimum agreement of this work, that in contrast of that many think is differentiated of ideas as of that ' ' to preserve the material certification, guarantees contents it the preservation of memria' '. game is more complex of what it makes look like, after all, the past social relations are not imprisoned in the things, and yes, in the dialectic, defined so well for Waldsia Russio (1981), between the citizen, the space and the object. Triad in which, each one exerts its paper in way accomplishes for the establishment what it called in fact museal. To exceed the simplista barrier of the preservation while ' ' I accumulate material' ' it places in guideline the permanent communication of ideas, feelings and sensations around the good, fruit of an ingenious work that throughout the years transformed the nature and the proper humanity. Therefore, preserving is attributed to it ' ' value of processo' ' , as much for its selective character, how much politician. We evidence in this sensible magnifying of the almost mythical character that entorna the act to preserve, in launching in privileged way to a reflective positioning, to the default it time, this so implacable agent of the finitude of...