May 24, 2012

Marriage Validity Marriage now has validity stated period. The relation between man and woman if has become each descompromissada time more. In the future the commemoration of gold and silver weddings goes to be rare. Up to 1977 it did not have I divorce in Brazil. The law I divorce of it, of initiative of Nelson senator Sheep, started to allow that a time was errasse. The Constitution of 1988 opened the portire, however demanding bigger time of wait. Now if it can divorce even though in the Notary's office, not depending on the intervention of justice, with exception when it has litigation between the parts. If she cannot devaluate the marriage and wise people had been the words of the Eneir philosopher War when she said: The marriage continues being a ortaleza, it was only more easy to enter and to leave. Another day in a hearing the woman of the defendant was inquired to give information after the husband. Has how much lives you to time with the defendant? One year. Which is the full name of it? Zoim. I do not want to know the nickname, but the name and last name. I do not know. Everybody flame of Zoim. But Mrs. deferred payment with it has one year and it did not ask to which its name to it? Not. The conjugal unions are so dismissable that it has hour that not of in time nor asking the name. In another one case the woman was searching the paternity of the room son. The three first ones were children of distinct parents. It insisted that the last son was fruit of the relation with its last friend. The DNA examination proved the opposite. It has people marrying the working life in the marriage certificate. It said me to a young woman that he goes to be married. However, she will only be married until passing in the competition. Later he intends to follow career and the husband will go to confuse its plans. He is for this reason that Milor Fernandes...
Sergio Verssimo This condition must the same it the fact of the treatment given to these types of assistants be attributed to the unitary facultative joint parties, as already it was pointed out. The Solicitor of the City of Native of London, Sergio Verssimo de Oliveira Son, in the ones backwards the following writing: ' ' the litisconsorcial assistant can practise any act during the course of the process, it has mere procedural matrix, or same he directly reaches the material right in litigation, as the legal recognition of the order or the resignation. Even because, in being ' ' litisconsortes' ' , they submit it the made use one in art. 48 of the CPC: ' ' except for disposal in the opposite, the joint parties will be considered, in its relations with the adverce party, as litigant distinct; the acts and the omissions of one will not harm nor will benefit outros' ' 12 In this diapaso, ' ' if in one data process, intend the plaintiff to give up the action, being been necessary the assent of the male defendant, since this already offers its plea, and having qualified assistance, the assent of the assistant also will be demanded so that the waiver of an action is homologated by sentence, thus being able to produce its efeitos' ' 13. On the other hand, diverse condition occurs with the adhesive assistants, who for not being titular of the procedural legal relationship, act as mere assistant, being subordinated to the part the one that they attend, not being able to practise acts that oppose the orientaes adopted for the attended one. In such a way, the simple assistant cannot, for example, give up the action or to modify the order, a time that, these are acts attributed to the bearers of the material legal relationship. this well-known difference with respect to the performance of the two types of assistants, is presented one more time, when we take for object only paragraph of art.